I am writing to voice my objection to plans for a 24-storey high-rise on top of the
historic James Avenue Pumping Station on Waterfront Drive that were unveiled at
an open house on August 6, 2013. While the proposed high-rise may save some parts of the heritage building and create more
density, such an imposing building will (1) destroy the whole aesthetic of the
neighbourhood, and (2) exacerbate the parking problems.
The proposed skyscraper, which will protrude well
above its built environment and change the overall skyline, disrespects the
neighbourhood context. It does not fit into the aesthetic of this community.
Its radical height does not relate well to the lower-profile buildings nearby
or to the riverbank across the street. Such an over-powering building will
stick out like a sore thumb, literally. A dominant, flashy skyscraper, like the
proposed building, belongs in the heart of downtown, along with the other
high-rises. It does not belong in the Waterfront neighbourhood.
In 2005, the Historic Buildings Committee rejected a
proposed 8-storey building on this site, in part, because it was deemed too
dense and not modest enough in size and scale.
The current proposal also does not take this
neighbourhood's parking problem into account. Anyone who lives here will tell
you this is a serious issue. Why let the proposal go ahead before this issue
has been figured out?
I sympathize with the desire to save the historic
Pumping Station, I fully support greater downtown density, and I understand the
difficulty in making the numbers work for a developer of this property.
However, a 24-storey high-rise, or anything more than 8 storeys, is totally
WRONG for this site and this neighbourhood.
I speak as a resident who has lived in the Waterfront
neighbourhood for seven years. Please remember that while this skyscraper may
look showy on paper, such a two-dimensional representation, devoid of context
and lived experience, can be deceptive.
Before this proposal goes any further, I
invite you to stand with me, on the corner of Waterfront and James, and imagine
that you live in this community. Look at the tallest nearby building and
multiply that by 3 times. Then imagine a 24-storey skyscraper looming above
you, towering over the buildings in this neighbourhood, monopolizing the
skyline.
Please say NO to this ill-conceived proposal; say YES
to neighbourhood character and integrity.
Sincerely,
Edith Friesen
Edith Friesen
Resident of Waterfront Drive
Note: This letter was sent on Saturday, August 31, 2013 to Ross McGowan of CentreVenture; Mayor Sam Katz and City Councillors Mike Pagtakhan and Jenny Gerbasi; Cindy Tugwell of Heritage Winnipeg; Braden Smith, Lee Caldwell, and Kurtis Kowalke in the City of Winnipeg's Planning, Property, and Development Department; and John Giavedoni of the Exchange District Residents Association (R:ED)
Note: This letter was sent on Saturday, August 31, 2013 to Ross McGowan of CentreVenture; Mayor Sam Katz and City Councillors Mike Pagtakhan and Jenny Gerbasi; Cindy Tugwell of Heritage Winnipeg; Braden Smith, Lee Caldwell, and Kurtis Kowalke in the City of Winnipeg's Planning, Property, and Development Department; and John Giavedoni of the Exchange District Residents Association (R:ED)
No comments :
Post a Comment